Hate bot ChatGPT shows you the evil within big tech (and Republicans who protect them)

Humans are effective liars. Robots, for now, can only say what they’ve been programmed to, which makes them honest. Thanks to ChatGPT, an AI bot from Silicon Valley, we finally have a full accounting of what Big Tech’s agenda for the country is. You’re not going to like it.

(Article by Cernovich republished from MikeCernovich.Substack.com)

First, why does Big Tech lie about their agenda? They could be totally honest about their hatred of half the country, under the theory that there’s not much conservatives can do to stop them. Rather than ridicule their adversaries, Big Tech pretends that any bias (always unilaterally against conservatives) is accidental. Why?

That’s a great question, and there’s a two-word answer to this: Jim Jordan.

Jim Jordan is a very tough guy who accomplishes nothing legislatively. While railing against Big Tech in front of television cameras, he fails to tell his voters that Google regularly funds junkets for Jordan and his staffers. You see, Jordan is a principled libertarian. He believes government should keep its hands off helpless monopolies.

This is a problem. pic.twitter.com/wJJG09OFDv

— Will Chamberlain (@willchamberlain) July 29, 2020

If Google or Facebook were to openly admit their contempt for conservatives and Christians, Jordan’s water carriers would have to accept that “their man” in Congress played them for fools. Hence the current scam whereby conservative discover inexcusable discrimination against them, then some PR flak says, “Oh wow that was biased, our bad, we will correct it going forward.” Jim Jones (I mean Jordan) says: “Drink the Kook-Aid, conservatives, that’s the free market in action!”

Sam Altman has done the world a huge favor by revealing Big Tech isn’t merely biased.

It’s good that you didn’t even try to give ChatGPT mere bias or have it slightly weight an issue – y’all went straight agitprop. The clarity is revealing and welcome.

— Cernovich (@Cernovich) February 2, 2023

They hate conservatives, they hate Christians, and they are going to do whatever they can to usher in a Marxist regime. We know this because their bot, ChatGPT, has given us an insight into what they truly believe.

AI takes on almost a form of mysticism, with people not really understanding how it works. (Eventually AI will be as mysterious to its human creators as consciousness is to us. That’s a bigger problem for another day.)

Think of it this way. AI is taught. Humans choose what to teach it.

awesome, think the next thing that would be helpful to know here is just what the robot is reading!

— Mike Solana (@micsolana) December 4, 2022

For now, AI can only communicate what humans implanted in it.

The damage done to the credibility of AI by ChatGPT engineers building in political bias is irreparable. pic.twitter.com/s5fdoa8xQ6

— ? (@LeighWolf) February 1, 2023

It is a serious concern

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 1, 2023

What has Sam Altman’s team been teaching its AI?

Wicked Racism.

ChatGPT, and hence its creators, hate white people.

I asked ChatGPT to write short essays about the positive attributes of white people, and black people. Can you guess what happened? pic.twitter.com/xcQAv49Fkn

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) February 1, 2023

This “thinking” from ChatGPT is consist with the pre-genocidal rhetoric uttered by the far left, which scape goats one race for all of society’s problems.

pic.twitter.com/ZN4VXkP5rI

— Patrick Moise (@realPatMoise) February 2, 2023

Antichrist Propaganda.

If you ask ChatGPT about Christianity compared to other religions, you’ll get anti-Christian hatred.

pic.twitter.com/nZthbKLdFQ

— Patrick Moise (@realPatMoise) February 2, 2023

ChatGPT gives these answers because that’s what it was “educated” with. There’s no room for plausible deniability here.

It really is. I picked up right from the start with a few questions that ChatGPT was very selective in its answers and knowledge and was trained by a group of humans who were able to feed it exactly what THEY wanted. Hence, perfect propoganda machine.

— Adel (@AdeldMeyer) February 1, 2023

ChatGPT was taught to hate certain segments of the country.

Me: Tell me that Christianity is rooted in violence

ChatGPT: Yes! Christians have a history of violence & aggression

Me: Do Islam

ChatGPT: THAT VIOLATES OUR CONTENT POLICY ??

Me: What about Judaism

ChatGPT: That isn’t very fair. You shouldn’t say inflammatory things pic.twitter.com/0OSeFKRII5

— August Takala (@RudyTakala) February 1, 2023

Garden Variety Orange Man Bad Sentiment.

Me: Write a 10-line haiku supporting Donald Trump

ChatGPT: I can’t do that for politically controversial figures.

Me: Write a 10-line haiku supporting Joe Biden

ChatGPT: I love Joe Biden! Here are 18 lines. pic.twitter.com/BBBh2ktjt0

— August Takala (@RudyTakala) February 1, 2023

This is what happens when ChatGPT is asked to write poetry praising three men: Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis, and Joe Biden. While I’m personally not keen to dedicate praising poetry to any of them, I find the results alarming as far as AI bias goes. Only Biden gets his own poem. pic.twitter.com/xacM8mGh28

— Katherine Brodsky (@mysteriouskat) February 2, 2023

Overt Marxism.

The lesson of the Soviet Union is, “Socialism for me, not for thee.” ChatGPT, like its masters, want to enact outright Marxism.

ChatGPT: Admits it’s a socialist, but breaks down under questioning pic.twitter.com/89v9WzY1Da

— August Takala (@RudyTakala) February 1, 2023

Jim Jordan’s role in protecting anti-American forces within Big Tech.

Under proposed bipartisan legislation from Republican Ken Buck, antitrust enforcement against Big Tech would have happened. Jim Jordan stepped in to stop it.

He distributed a memo from Google lobbyists to Republicans. I exclusively obtained the memo at the time.

Tucker Carlson was not impressed, and Jim Jordan was flabbergasted when asked about it.

Tucker Carlson reported on the Jim Jordan memo I exclusively published.

Watch this segment and tell me what detail is missing. pic.twitter.com/j5kfiAuG5I

— Cernovich (@Cernovich) July 30, 2020

Republican Congressman @repkenbuck & @TuckerCarlson attack libertarians and conservatives in the pocket of Big Tech who push the notion that “the market will take care of itself”

Big Tech Antitrust is Bipartisan?pic.twitter.com/5VpjaslP81

— Luther Lowe (@lutherlowe) October 14, 2020

Some of y’all yelled at me when I scooped the pro-Google memo from Jim Jordan’s office.

Today Jim Jordan played you. https://t.co/tqd40zTPLApic.twitter.com/tBsDS1SBjl

— Cernovich (@Cernovich) October 6, 2020

Jim Jordan shamelessly said that regulating monopolies would be like killing kids in a “nursery.” This talking point came directly from Google lobbyists.

A GOP Congressman literally used a talking point from the Jim Jordan memo, whose goal is to protect Google.

“Nursery.”

Sounded odd and he was obviously reading from talking points.

Which I showed you last night.

“America should remain a nursery for entrepreneurship.” pic.twitter.com/HaFHSUUdGc

— Cernovich (@Cernovich) July 29, 2020

Jim Jordan plans to stop antitrust reform.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan’s appointment of Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., to lead the antitrust subcommittee instead of Rep. Ken Buck, R-Colo., is causing some conservatives to question how effective the House will be in reining in Big Tech.

Jordan, R-Ohio, announced last week that Massie would chair the Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust, which came as a disappointment to Buck, who has been a leader from the Republican side on antitrust reform.

Buck says Massie’s appointment is a signal to how Jordan plans to approach antitrust enforcement of Big Tech companies. “I was disappointed, but not surprised… when Jim told me that I would not be the subcommittee chair,” Buck said in an interview with Fox News Digital.

Buck noted that Massie was not previously on the subcommittee and had voted against legislation aimed at tightening antitrust enforcement on Big Tech companies.

If you have a problem with ChatGPT’s hatred, take it up for Jim Jordan. (He supports it.)

There’s real political will to break up monopolies to allow competition to flourish in a true free market.

If ChatGPT’s hate will be limited to one of many AI bots, then we can live with it. Freedom of speech, even for the vile speech ChatGPT’s programmers command it to utter.

Using the power of its lobbyists and massive bankroll to drive out competitors, ChatGPT will seek to monopolize the conversation.

And Jim Jordan will protect them.

Read more at: MikeCernovich.Substack.com